Matt - Group Interaction: Part 1
Perhaps the most challenging academic assignments during my college career have necessitated extensive group interaction. This is indicative of the inherent communicative and organizational challenges posed when operating in a group – not the actual substance of the work. Academic assignments that mandate some-level of group cooperation in higher education are particularly difficult because of the basic design: the professor typically selects the group; students have extensive non-academic responsibilities, incomparable to primary education; the standards for academic excellence are diverse and sometimes seemingly incompatible; and academic research is perhaps most functional for the individual. The artificial bureaucracy created by the group dynamic often poses a seemingly insurmountable obstruction to the learning process and the extracted “lessons” are often more social than academic. However, real-life group scenarios often provide more pertinent and applicable “lessons” than those within the classroom because they generally lack the characteristics previously enumerated. Hopefully, these three antidotes should illuminate my grievances with the system:
Discussion of my Academic Work: Conducting Formal Research in the Group Dynamic
During the spring of my sophomore year I was enrolled in an exceptionally engaging course NCLC Peace Studies, which explored the theories of peace and its application domestically and internationally. While the curriculum was diverse and truly ambitious, it was pragmatic as it identified the problems evident in conflict and then the potential means for overcoming it. The professor emphasized the intangible and often institutional acts of violence that provoke “hard” violence. While the subject-matter was fascinating it was a bit too theoretical for the group I was paired up with to deliver a comprehensive presentation on economic injustices in Washington, D.C.
The initial challenge posed to the group was how to effectively articulate the issues associated with economic injustice and provide unique analysis. There are several non-profit organizations that have authored extensively on the economic injustices found in our nation’s capital and were central to our findings; however, the intent of the project was to conduct original research that might further elucidate the well-documented findings – including the group’s thesis.
Without the infrastructure of a formal organization that has resources, conducting primary research was a daunting task. Moreover, the subject matter was largely theoretical but with very tangible subcategories (i.e. availability to quality healthcare, affordable housing, great education, etc.), which made focusing the research very difficult. The fundamental obstacle posed by this assignment was organizational as it demanded a methodical and disciplined approach to completing the project. This was particularly challenging for me as the issues were cognizant but difficult to communicate and delegate among group members. That is to say, the group understood the issues but had difficultly examining the specifics without completing the entire assignment. On the most challenging of assignments, I find it desirable to work independently because the preferred outcomes seem far more attainable and subject-matter is generally more lucid.
Written Text
For one to appreciate group interaction, the study of conflict resolution is a necessity. Although this assertion may seem a bit cynical, academic groups almost inevitably experience some level of conflict. It was with great pleasure that I enrolled in an international conflict resolution course last spring, where I further examined the practical application of conflict resolution theory. The most impressionable publications that I reviewed were Bill Ury’s The Third Side and Joseph Nye’s Understanding International Conflicts, which extensively debunk the source of conflict and examine solutions. While I certainly do not contend that the import of my group interactions is on par with resolving international crises, the basic theories presented in these texts have better enabled me to understand group interaction.
Non-Written Text: Pressing Forward on the Thames
The purest form of group interaction is actualized in group sport. As a marginal athlete who’s physical hobbies are generally for the recluse (skiing and hiking), it was a pleasant challenge to join the St Catherine’s College Rowing Society. While the performance of most sports teams is often measurable by their ability to effectively utilize all members of the group (see the 2004 Boston Red Sox), this skill is strikingly evident when rowing. With an eight-member crew and a cox, the team must row fluidly and entirely in-sync. All rowers must properly perform nearly a dozen motions simultaneously for the boat to move forward. Operating as a cohesive unit is absolutely critical when rowing, as a boat of eight renegade rowers is effectively useless. For instance, a highly efficient team of average rowers could beat eight Olympians that do not stroke together.
Over the course of Michaelmas Term, I was paired with eight novice rowers that had an exceptional desire to win. Prior to sunrise, I spent most mornings with the team preparing the boat for a morning of rowing. As the term waned, the competency of the crew surged; at the outset, we struggled to row in groups of two but eventually morphed into a synchronized squad of eight. The object of our desire was to perform well in the Christ Church Regatta – Oxford’s premiere rowing competition during the fall term. Indeed, the team managed to actualize this goal, stroking well past Wadham College during the first round and falling just short of St Anthony’s College in the round of elimination.
